I left Leipzig (no internet connection in the hotel, glorious and indefectible wifi at the conference) and headed to Wuppertal (no network at the conference, good but expensive wifi in the hotel, well, what the heck, it’s worth its 5 euros), where I will not be able to tweet frantically like I did today (check out #frt2012 !). This is not the only reason why I will regret Leipzig. I enjoyed this one day at the Frankoromanistentag because I could spend time with people I wish I could work with more closely like Christof Schöch, because I could see and hear again Gudrun Gersmann, but also because I met with people who already knew me – through my blog.

This came as a bit of a surprise. In fact, feedback on my blog never comes in a form that I had anticipated. The colleagues across the street read my blog, the colleagues on the floor above my office read my blog – without posting commentaries. In her paper presenting this morning, Lilian Landes talked about the silence on the commentaries’ side of the web, enouncing the so-called 90-9-1 rule: 90 % read articles on the web, 9 % write some, 1% comment on it. Obviously, the reluctance to comment is a widely spread disease, and it does not necessarily mean that people don’t read or care about blog posts. Over these past months, Brazil has been the top visiting country of my blog and I have been speculating about these Brazilian readers: why should they be interested in what I write? Even when I emphasize the Prussian roots of what I talk about, this does not seem to discourage them. Hmm…

Being asked to explain what I post in my blog, I stated what seemed to me to be the obvious: my blog is an archive of the progress of our digital edition, and a way of clarify my own ideas along the process, and a way of adressing technical issues, and a way to present the texts we work on, and a way of communicating all that to my team and work partners, and I do it in English to reach a wider audience as well (or maybe it is just because I really could not choose between German and French?). Of course, for each of those functions, I could probably use other tools, but the blog is a plastic form that allows to do all that in just one format. What use is it that all the reflexions on the progress of the edition are published, I was asked. Could I not as well consignate it for myself in some kind of personal work diary? Inspite of the fact that I get so little direct feedback on my posts, I don’t think I could do all of this writing if it were just to create a personal archive that nobody would read – or would read immediately. The discipline of the weekly post I have somehow set to myself forces me to make the effort of looking back weekly at what I have done. Sometimes it is interesting, sometimes not. Some posts are more constitent than others, but writing about it always helps me move forward.

It is also like having some kind of date with an invisible readership whom I suppose is entertained by (or interested in) the episodes of this research adventure that is still in development. I am not really sure whether non-scholars consider my blog of any interest;  as for scholars, I figure that the struggle my research group and I fight to find our place in the academic landscape feels familiar to them and  that this can make some kind of incentive to follow it.

In her paper, Gudrun Gersmann weighed advantages and inconvenients of blogging, especially for young researchers. You probably can objectivate some of them, but blogging remains a fairly subjective decision that involves one’s relationship to writing in general. I suppose blogging can be of help to persons who are having difficulties writing in the first place, as a first and more informal contact with scholarly writing directing towards “real” academical writing. On the other end of the spectrum, I like blogging because I like writing in general and non-scholarly writing in particular (I like scholarly writing too, but I have enough ways to express that liking without needing blogging!) . And I like blogging because leading a group of 6 persons through such a perillous adventure as a digital edition in a scientific community that often has trouble accepting the “digital” part of it requires me to take the time for a weekly look back. When I don’t post, I have the feeling that I don’t hold firmly to all of the strings the other 6 members of the team have trusted me with.

Anne Baillot

I studied German Studies and Philosophy in Paris where I got my PhD in 2002. I then moved to Berlin, where I have been living & doing research ever since. My areas of specialty include German literature, Digital Humanities, textual scholarship and intellectual history. I am currently working at the Centre Marc Bloch in Berlin as an expert in digital technologies for the humanities.

You may also like...

3 Responses

  1. Jan Hecker-Stampehl says:

    I feel with you. Although I try to encourage colleagues (actually just some floors below your office ;o) ) to comment on blog posts, both on the blog that I run and one that students have started, they do not engage in commenting. In fact, only a few of my own posts received comments at all, mostly “social markers”, not really engaging in scholarly discussion. I’m still trying to figure out why that is the case, but nevertheless, I keep on going, since I think it’s us who might have to establish blogging in the humanities (in Germany at least) as a cultural practice.
    Honestly speaking, we also have to ask ourselves: how much do we actually comment on other people’s blog posts. Well…should be more, I guess (at least in my case).

  2. Mareike König says:

    Dear Anne, I think you are right: a lot of people do read blog posts and just because they do not leave a comment does not mean they don’t care about it. They may cite it elsewhere (in a paper or oraly on a conference). Marin Dacos calls that the “silent conversation” (
    And again: sometimes you just read a post and you don’t have anything to add to it. There was a blogpost the other day on how to be a good commenter (the post has over 60 comments!).
    The first of the ten rules was not to comment a post and just say: yes, you are right. I do not agree with that rule, cause that means people hardly comment at all. Sometimes you just want to say: thanks for that post, I enjoyed reading it! That is the case here. Thank you!

  1. 10/10/2012

    […] the production of the digital edition „Letters and texts. The intellectual Berlin around 1800“ [], eingesehen 21.9.2012. 28 0 Daniel Cohen/Roy Rosenzweig: Digital History. A Guide to Gathering, […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *